Skip to main content

The effect of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis on the interaction between CD19+B cells and CD4+T cells in peripheral blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Background

The defect of B cell self-tolerance and the continuous antigen presentation by T cells (TCs) mediated by autoreactive B cells (BCs) play a key role in the occurrence and development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis negatively regulates the immune response of TCs after activation and maintains immune tolerance. However, the effect of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis on the interaction between CD19+B/CD4+TCs in the peripheral blood of patients with SLE has not been studied in detail.

Methods

PD-1/PD-L1 and Ki-67 levels in peripheral blood (PB) of 50 SLE patients and 41 healthy controls (HCs) were detected through flow cytometry, and then the expression of PD-1+/−cells and PD-L1+/−cells Ki-67 was further analyzed. CD19+B/CD4+TCs were separated for cell culture and the supernatant was collected to determine proliferation and differentiation of TCs. IL-10 and IFN-γ secretion in the supernatant was also determined using ELISA.

Results

The PD-1, PD-L1, and Ki-67 levels on CD19+B/CD4+TCs in patients with SLE were higher than HCs. In CD19+B/CD4+TCs of SLE patients, the proliferative activity of PD-L1+ cells was higher than that of PD-L1 cells, and the proliferative activity of PD-1+ cells was higher than that of PD-1 cells. In the system co-culturing CD19+B/CD4+TCs from HCs/SLE patients, activated BCs promoted TCs proliferation and PD-L1 expression among TCs. Addition of anti-PD-L1 to co-culture system restored the proliferation of TCs, and inhibited IL-10/IFN-γ level. The addition of anti-PD-L1 to co-culture system also restored Tfh and downregulated Treg in HCs.

Conclusions

Axis of PD-1/PD-L1 on CD19+B/CD4+TCs in PB of SLE patients is abnormal, and cell proliferation is abnormal. In CD19+B/CD4+TCs of SLE patients, the proliferative activity of PD-L1+ and PD-1+ cells compared with PD-L1 and PD-1 cells in SLE patients, respectively. CD19+B/CD4+TCs in SLE patients can interact through PD-1/PD-L1.

Introduction

The autoimmune disease SLE has complex and diverse clinical manifestations. It is characterized by the activation of innate/adaptive immunity, which causes the activation of autoreactive B cells (BCs) through T cells (TCs), resulting in the deposition of immune complexes and causing an autoimmune cascade possibly limited to an organ, as well as extensive systemic involvement [1,2,3]. Its pathogenesis remains obscure but insufficient tolerance of BCs and continuous antigen presentation by TCs exert a pivotal effect on the disease development [4]. CD4+TCs are helper cells that play an integral role in B cell development/activation [5]. Lupus TCs are related to the immunopathogenesis of lupus through several pathways: excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines or increased adhesion between cells attack target cells or tissues leading to apoptosis of target cells; TCs initiate precursors of autoimmune B cell through cytokines along with costimulatory molecules to produce anti-apoptotic signals of autoimmune cells [6, 7]; increased CD4+TCs in lupus blood has the potential to help BCs through IL-10/succinate [8].

PD-1 (CD279) is a transmembrane molecule of the immunoglobulin CD28 family [9] and its ligand PD-L1 (CD274 or B7-H1) is expressed on BCs, TCs, monocytes, as well as dendritic cells. In addition, it is also extensively expressed in non-blood cells, including the lung, vascular endothelial cells, reticular fibroblasts, etc. [10]. Toll-like receptors together with type I interferon can modulate the expression level of PD-1/PD-L1 via activating NF-κB and/or STAT1 [11]. As antigen-presenting cells (APC), PD-L1 on BCs is able to combine with PD-1 on TCs to negatively modulate the immune response as well as sustain immune tolerance [12]. Ki-67 protein is widely considered to be an indicator for cell proliferation in human tumors [13] and it is a necessary nuclear protein for cell proliferation, and its expression is confined to the phases of G1/S/G2/M during the cell cycle [14]. However, the role as well as clinical significance of Ki-67 expression in PD-1+/-and PD-L1+/-cells, especially for SLE, are unclear. Therefore, this study examined the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 as well as Ki-67 on CD4+TCs and CD19+BCs in healthy controls (HCs) together with SLE patients.

As the main component of cellular immune response, CD4+TCs exert a crucial impact on infection control [5]. Regulatory TCs (Treg) belong to a subset of CD4+TCs, potentially inhibiting T cell-based immunity to avoid damage caused by excessively activated TCs [9]. TFH cells are the major TCs in humans and mice and are responsible for supporting the proliferation, survival, and differentiation of BCs. In mammalian germinal centers (GCs), Tfh exerts a crucial effect on the selection/differentiation of BCs into activated antibody-secreting cells [15, 16]. Studies have demonstrated a lower PD-L1 expression on CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Treg cells after induction culture in patients with in contrast to HCs and a negative association with SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) [17]. Our previous studies demonstrated higher expression of CD4+TCs among patients with active SLE in contrast to those with stable SLE and HCs, with a higher expression among patients with stable SLE when further compared to HCs. Besides, the increased frequency of CD19+PD-L1+BCs is strongly related to the disease activity index as well as the frequency of Tfh cells [18].

The PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis transmits a negative signal to TCs to prevent SLE progression but the abnormal activation of TCs/BCs results in the continuous progression of SLE. Therefore, in the present study, immunomagnetic cell sorting, flow cytometry (FCM), ELISA, and cell culture were used to test the influence of signaling axis of PD-1/PD-L1 on the system co-culturing CD19+B and CD4+TCs in the peripheral blood (PB) of patients with SLE. CD19+BCs together with CD4+TCs were cocultured in vitro to assess the proliferation of TCs and the differentiation of Tfh/Treg cells. The expression of IFN-γ and IL-10 was detected by ELISA.

Materials and methods

Patients and healthy controls

In total, 50 patients complying with the American College of Rheumatology criteria for lupus were enrolled from the Rheumatism Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College in Bengbu, China. Any patient would be clinically diagnosed if ≥ 4 of the following 11 criteria were observed complying with the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for SLE [19].The disease activity was evaluated according to SLEDAI-2000 based on the conditions of central nervous system, blood vessels, kidneys, joints, skin, serous membrane, blood, and systemic symptoms within the first 10 days of treatment. The higher the score, the more severe the disease activity and the more critical the condition.

We recruited healthy individuals who were age and sex-matched as the controls. The study was ratified by the Human Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and Supplementary Table S1 displays their baseline characteristics.

Cell staining and FCM analysis

The measurement of PD-1, PD-L1, as well as Ki-67 on CD4+TCs/CD19+BCs in blood samples from HCs / SLE patients using the following antibodies: AF488 anti-human Ki-67 (Ki-67, Biolegend), APC anti-human PD-L1 (MIH2, Biolegend), BV421 anti-human PD-1 (MIH4, BD), PE/Cy7 anti-human CD4 (OKT4, Biolegend), as well as APC/FireTM-750 anti-human CD19 (HIB19, Biolegend). For Ki-67, the cells were permeabilized (eBiosciences) before staining with the indicated antibodies.

TC subsets were detected following coculture with BCs using the antibodies as folllows: APC/Cy7 anti-human CD19 (HIB19, Biolegend), AF647 anti-human FOXP3 (259D, Biolegend), FITC anti-human CD185 (CXCR5) (J252D4, Biolegend), PE anti-human CD25(M-A251, BD), and BV421 anti-human CD4 (RPA-T4, BD). Fixable Viability Dye eFlour 506 (eBiosciences) was used for the exclusion of dead cells. Treg cells were permeabilized before staining using the indicated antibodies. The data obtained from D×P Athena were analyzed using FlowJo.

Co-culture of T and B cells

CD4+T/CD19+BCs were isolated using CD4/CD19 magnetic beads (Miltenyi) yielding > 95% CD4+TCs with > 95% CD19+BCs. Subsequently, BCs were stimulated by 40 ng/ml of IL-2 (PeproTech) as well as 1 µg/ml of cytosine-phosphate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotide (CPG-ODN) 2006 (Invivogen) for 24 h and then co-cultured with autologous CD4+TCs in complete medium in 96-well plates that were pre-coated with anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml, OKT3, Biolegend) as well as anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml, CD28.2, Biolegend) for 3 days at 37℃ and 5% CO2. After 24 h, anti-PD-L1 (10 µg/ml, 29E.2A3, Biolegend) and isotype control were added to the co-culture. On day 3, cells were examined by FCM. Furthermore, we measured the production of IL-10 and IFN-γ, which were secreted into the supernatant of the cell culture, using ELISA.

Cell proliferation

CD4+TCs were incubated with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; BD) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for a period of 10 min at 37 °C. Before ending the labeling process, an equivalent amount of bovine serum albumin was added to the cells. Subsequently, after triplicately washing the cells, they were kept gentle shaking in the dark. Besides, CFSE signal was quantified by FCM.

ELISA

IFN-γ and IL-10 (DAKEWE) secretion in the supernatants of cell culture was analyzed by ELISA complying with the instructions provided by the manufacturer.

Data analysis

FCM data were analyzed using Flowjo10.4 software and the experimental data were analyzed using SPSS26.0. The data were described with mean ± standard deviation (x ± s); t-tests were carried out to compare the differences between groups. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted. A P value less than 0.05 was indicative of statistical significance.

Results

Differential expression of PD-L1, PD-1 and Ki-67 on CD19+B/CD4+TCs

Compared to HCs, the expression of PD-L1, PD-1, and Ki-67 was significantly higher on CD4+TCs from patients with SLE; and the frequency of the expression of PD-1 / PD-L1 on CD19+BCs among SLE patients was also higher with statistical significance (Fig. 1). In addition ,we analyze the expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and Ki-67 on CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells in relation to drug therapy. The result showed no correlation between the expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and Ki67 on CD4+T cells and CD19+B cells and drug treatment status (Supplementary Table S2 and S3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Expression of PD-L1, PD-1, and Ki-67 on CD4+TCs and CD19+BCs. (A-C) Flow and statistical plots of PD-L1 (A), PD-1 (B), and Ki-67 (C) expression frequency on peripheral blood CD4+TCs from SLE patients and HC. (D-F) Flow and statistical plots of PD-L1 (D), PD-1 (E), and Ki-67 (F) expression frequency on peripheral blood CD19+BCs from SLE patients and HC. ***P < 0.001, *P < 0.05

Correlation of CD19+BCs with CD4+TCs

The linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation of CD4+Ki-67+TCs with CD4+PD-1+TCs (r = 0.332, P < 0.05), and the percentage of CD19+Ki-67+BCs (r = 0.384, P < 0.05) in HCs. The average fluorescence intensity of CD4+PD-1+TCs was in a positive association with CD4+PD-L1+TCs (r = 0.576, P < 0.001), and the percentage of CD4+PD-L1+TCs was positively associated with CD19+PD-L1+BCs (r = 0.512, P < 0.001) and CD19+PD-1+BCs (r = 0.403, P < 0.001). For SLE patients, there was a positive correlation of CD4+Ki-67+TCs with CD19+Ki-67+BCs (r = 0.323, P < 0.05); besides, the average fluorescence intensity of CD19+PD-L1+BCs was in a positive association with CD19+PD-1+BCs (r = 0.572, P < 0.01), as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Correlation analysis of PD-L1, PD-1 and Ki-67 on CD19+B and CD4+T cells

Ki-67 expression on PD-1+/- and PD-L1+/- cells

Further analysis revealed a higher ratio of CD4+PD-L1-Ki-67+TCs as well as CD4+PD-1+/-Ki-67 TCs among SLE patients compared to HCs (Fig. 2A and B). In addition, there was a higher ratio of CD19+PD-L1-Ki-67+ BCs & CD19+PD-1-Ki-67+BCs in SLE patients compared to HCs. The proportions of CD19+PD-L1+Ki-67+, CD19+PD-L1-Ki-67+, as well as CD19+PD-1+Ki-67+ BCs were not significantly different between groups but the ratio of CD19+PD-1-Ki-67+ (SLE: 2.63%±2.04% vs. HC: 1.92%±0.74%, P = 0.038) BCs between groups was significantly different (Fig. 2C and D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression of Ki-67 in PD-1+/− cells and PD-L1+/− cells. (A-B) Flow plots and statistical results of Ki-67 in CD4+PD-L1+/−TCs (A) versus CD4+PD-1+/−TCs (B) from the peripheral blood of SLE patients and HCs. (C-D) Flow plots and statistical results of Ki-67 in CD19+PD-L1+/−BCs (A) and CD19+PD-1+/−BCs (B) from the peripheral blood of SLE patients and HCs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

There were also more CD4+PD-L1+Ki-67+TCs than CD4+PD-L1-Ki-67+TCs among SLE patients with SLE (P < 0.001), with more CD4+PD-L1+Ki-67+TCs than CD4+PD-L1-Ki-67+TCs in HCs and SLE patients. Meanwhile, there was a higher proportion of CD19+PD-L1+Ki-67+BCs to CD19+PD-L1-Ki-67+BCs among HCs and SLE patients with more CD19+PD-1+Ki-67+BCs compared to CD19+PD-1-Ki-67+BCs.

Activated BCs are more conducive to T cell proliferation and PD-L1 expression

It has been shown that CD19+BCs collected from untreated patients with RA and HCs similarly upregulated PD-L1 expression once stimulated by CpG/IL-2 [20]. To explore PD-L1 expression on CD19+BCs from SLE patients, CD19+BCs were isolated and purified from the PB collected from four SLE patients as well as four HCs, and cultured with either CPG or IL-2. There was a significantly higher frequency and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PD-L1 expression on CD19+BCs collected from HCs and SLE patients compared to untreated cells after one day of culture (Fig. 3A and B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of activated CD19+BCs on the expression and proliferation of PD-L1 and PD-1 in CD4+TCs. (A) Representative histograms of PD-L1 expression on total CD19+BCs. (B) Expression (frequency, left panel, and MFI, right panel) of CD19+PD-L1+BCs. (C) Flow cytometry of the effects of activated CD19+BCs on the proliferation of CD4+TCs, and statistical results of the effects of activated CD19+BCs on the proliferation of CD4+TCs (D) and the expression of PD-L1 (E) and PD-1 (F). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

After 24 h of cell stimulation, BCs were washed two times using PBS and then divided into activated and non-activated groups for co-culture with CD4+TCs (1:1 for 48 h). The results revealed that for HCs and patients with SLE, expression of PD-1/PD-L1 was upregulated on the stimulated TCs, while that of PD-1 was very low on unstimulated TCs, consistent with studies by Shi et al. [12] and Said et al. [21]. In addition, activated CD19+BCs in HCs promoted the proliferation of CD4+TCs (P < 0.001) together with PD-1 expression on CD4+TCs (P < 0.001). Activated CD19+BCs of SLE patients promoted CD4+T cell proliferation along with PD-L1 expression (P < 0.05) but there was no significance in PD-1 expression (Fig. 3C-F).

Effects of activated TCs on PD-1 / PD-L1 on CD19+BCs

After stimulated for 24 h, TCs were co-cultured with CD19+BCs in the proportion of 1:1 for 48 h, showing that activated CD4+TCs promoted the PD-L1/PD-1 expression (P < 0.05) in CD19+BCs of HCs. Activated CD4+TCs also promoted PD-L1 expression (P < 0.01), accompanied with a trend toward upregulating PD-1 expression in CD19+BCs of SLE patients but without statistical significance (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of activated T cells on the expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 on CD19+BCs. (A-B) The plot of the effect of activated TCs on the expression of PD-L1 (A) and PD-1 (B) on the surface of CD19+BCs. ns: no statistical significance (P > 0.05), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Impact of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway on the proliferation and differentiation of CD4+ TCs in the co-culture system

The proliferation and differentiation of CD4+TCs were detected by adding anti-PD-L1 and the isotype to the co-culture system, confirming that the CD4+TC proliferation was restored via the pathway of PD-1/PD-L1 among HCs / SLE patients. In HC, anti-PD-L1 restored Tfh expression; meanwhile, it reduced the frequency of Treg (P < 0.05). Also, no obvious change in the CD4+T cell proliferation rate, Tfh, and Treg change ratio was observed in SLE patients and HC (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis on the proliferation and differentiation of CD4+TCs in the CD4+T/CD19+BCs co-culture system. CD19+B/CD4+TCs isolated from PBMC of HCs and SLE patients were co-cultured with anti-PD-L1 or isotype antibodies. The proliferation, Tfh, and Treg expression of CD4+TCs were detected 72 h later, and the corresponding statistical results are shown. (A-C) shows the statistical results of CD4+TC proliferation (A), Tfh (B), and Treg(C). (D-F) The increase rate of proliferating cells (D), Tfh (E), and Treg (F) cells was calculated as follows:\(\frac{\text{Proliferation, Tfh, Treg frequencies anti-PD-L1 group}-\text{Proliferation, Tfh, Treg frequencies isotype group}}{\text{Proliferation, Tfh, Treg frequencies anti-PD-L1 group}}\times 100\varvec{\%}\) ns had no statistical significance (P > 0.05), *P < 0.05

Detection of IL-10 / IFN-γ using ELISA

Next, we examined whether anti-PD-L1 could modulate IFN-γ / IL-10 secretion in the T and B co-culture system, showing that IFN-γ / IL-10 secretion decreased when anti-PD-L1 was added (P < 0.05, Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis on the secretion of cytokines IFN-γ and IL-10 in the CD4+T/CD19+BCs co-culture system. (A-B) CD19+BCs and CD4+TCs isolated from PBMC of HC and SLE patients were co-cultured with anti-PD-L1 or isotype antibodies and IFN-γ (A) and IL-10 (B) were quantified 72 h later by ELISA. *P < 0.05

Discussion

The etiology of SLE has not been fully elucidated but is related to many factors including genetic, environmental, infection, and hormones [22]. The production of BCs and autoantibodies is the key driving factor in SLE pathogenesis but without the proper support of TCs, BCs are ineffective and TCs provide BCs with the necessary costimulatory signals [23]. In the RA patient study, the ratio of CD19+PD-L1+BCs among untreated patients was significantly lower than that in HC patients, whereas after treatment, there was an increased frequency of PD-L1+BCs among patients with a positive response to treatment [20]. However, in patients with melanoma, the expression of B cell PD-L1 increased significantly and was positively correlated with the tumor stage [24]. SLE patients have been reported to have increased PD-1, Ki-67, or PD-L1 expression on CD11c+BCs [25]. Additionally, the ratio of CD4+PD-1+cells in psoriatic patients was much lower than compared to the control group [26]. In summary, PD-1 / PD-L1 expression is disease-specific on immune cells. In our study, there was a higher expression frequency of PD-L1 and PD-1 on CD4+T/ CD19+BCs from the PB of SLE patients compared to HCs, indicating the aberrant expressed pathway of PD-1/PD-L1 during the interaction of CD4+TCs with CD19+BCs.

Ki-67 protein, a common marker of proliferating cells, encodes a 359 KD non-histone nuclear protein [14] and was originally identified as an antigen in the nucleus of Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which is highly expressed in circulating cells but strongly downregulated in quiescent G0 cells [27]. Some studies have found that in early SLE, several expanded lymphocyte populations commonly express Ki-67 [28]. Ki-67+ cell populations, peripheral helper T (Tph) cells as well as age-related B cells (ABCs) remained elevated during the first year, and similar increases were observed in diagnosed SLE, suggesting these pathways to be activated early in SLE and characteristic of SLE pathologic immune responses [28]. Ki-67+NK cells are related to the increased production of autoantibodies, decreased levels of complement, and nephritis in SLE patients [29]. In vitro experiments have proved the influence of IL-15 on upregulating Ki-67 expression in NK cells [29]. Compared to HCs, Ki-67 expression in CD4+TCs and CD19+BCs of PB of patients with SLE was relatively higher. Also, the proportion of CD4+PD-L1-Ki-67+TCs, CD4+PD-1+/-Ki-67+TCs, CD19+PD-L1-Ki-67+, as well as CD19+PD-1-Ki-67+BCs in SLE patients, was higher compared to HCs. This suggests that the proliferative activity of CD4+TCs, CD19+BCs, CD4+PD-L1-TCs, CD4+PD-1+/-TCs, CD19+PD-L1- and CD19+PD-1-BCs was abnormal. In the research of tumors, it is generally believed that Ki67 is considered to be related to the prognosis of patients [30,31,32,33,34], while there are few relevant researches in SLE patients.

Some studies demonstrated among new patients with SLE, an upregulated serum level of PD-1 antibody, which is linked to the disease activity, was observed; besides, PD-1 autoantibody promoted the proliferation of CD4+TCs [12]. As reported by studies on patients with RA, CD19+BCs has a potentical in inhibiting CD8+TCs proliferation as well as cytokine production in a manner depending on PD-L1 [20]. In addition, PD-L1 immature BCs inhibit TCs depending on the level of PD-L1 among patients with melanoma (stage III and IV) [24]. In our study, activated CD19+B in HCs/SLE patients promoted the proliferation and PD-L1 expression in CD4+TCs. Thus, it was speculated that after activation, the negative signal increased and the proliferation decreased because of the increased expression of PD-L1. Therefore, PD-L1 blockers were added to investigate the impact of the axis of PD-1/PD-L1 on the interaction of CD4+TCs with CD19+BCs, showing that CD4+TC proliferation was restored by PD-1/PD-L1 pathway among HCs and SLE patients. In summary, we hypothesized that PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis exerts a crucial impact on activating pathogenic cell responses of TCs and BCs in SLE patients; Besides, BCs have the potential to regulate the T cell immune response by expressing regulatory molecules including PD-L1.

PD-L1hiB cells can regulate the expansion of TFH cells [35]. PD-1 limits the upregulation of CXCR3 on Tfh cells, thus concentrating cells in the germinal center, where the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction of a single Tfh cell with BCs optimizes the competition as well as affinity maturation of BCs [36]. Also, PD-L1 solely has a potential in inducing the immature CD4+TCs to differentiate into Foxp3-induced regulatory T (iTreg) cells [37]. The upregulation of PD-1 expression among SLE patients with the PTPN22 Trp620 missense allele is related to the decrease of Treg inhibition ability and the increase of T cell proliferation ability [38]. In addition, CTLA-4 expressed by Treg depleted CD80/CD86 through macrophages and released free PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells [39]. In our study, anti-PD-L1 restored the expression of Tfh but decreased that of Treg among HCs. Therefore, we believe that the inhibition of Tfh and the recovery of Treg expression by PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis when TCs interacts with BCs is key for TC inhibition along with the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. However, we speculate that based on individual differences or the impairment of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway among SLE patients, the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in the expression frequency of Tfh/Treg is not statistically significant.

As reported by experimental studies, PD-1+/-TCs are beneficial for the increase of IFN-γ/IL-17 production [39]. In studies of melanoma patients, B cell subsets could suppress IFN-γ expression by TCs in a manner depending on PD-L1 [24]. Several researchers have also suggested that the IFN-γ gene may occur early in patients with SLE [40], possibly playing a critical role in LN [41]. IL-10 can specifically block B cell responses in SLE mice [42]. It is commonly believed that IL-10 is paradoxical pathogenic in SLE. Our results proved that PD-L1 inhibition inhibited IL-10 / IFN-γ secretion, therefore, roles of IFN-γ and IL-10 for SLE cannot be ignored.

The roles of PD-L1 are various in immune regulation. Besides, PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis has complex pathogenicity in SLE. In addition to ITIM (inhibitory motif), the intracellular segment of PD-1 also has a structure called immune receptor complex tyrosine conversion motif (ITFM) which can bind tyrosine kinase or tyrosine phosphatase (such as SHP-2) according to the existence of a binding protein called SAP, to initiate negative regulation. The classical PD-1 pathway is related to the trans-interaction of PD-1 (on TCs) with PD-L1 (on APC or tumor cells), negatively regulating the immune response after the activation of TCs, thereby maintaining immune tolerance [12]. Recently, the existence of cis-interactions of PD-1 and APCs has been revealed on the same tumor cells or PD-L1 [43]. In addition, blocking [44] or activating [45] PD-1 can improve the survival of lupus mice. In addition, the combination of PD-1 agonist and low-dose IL-2 may have better therapeutic efficacy in SLE [46]. The susceptibility to SLE is also related to PD1.3/PD1.5 polymorphism, while the PD1.6 polymorphism is possibly protective for SLE [47].

In addition, this study has some limitations. (1) TCs and BCs were isolated for co-culture in vitro, while there are countless other cell types potentially expressing PD-L1, including dendritic cells, macrophages as well as bone marrow suppressor cells in the in vivo microenvironment. (2) In future studies, each cell type should be blocked by PD-L1 to distinguish effects of PD-L1 blockers on BCs or TCs. (3) However, its mechanism of action and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis need to be further studied. Reseach has shown that PD-L1-Ig can inhibit the formation of Th17 cells in several organs such as spleen and the kidney, clear the abnormal production of cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-10) and anti-dsDNA autoantibodies in the serum, inhibit the deposition of IgG in the glomeruli with decreased proteinuria, and activate TCs in the urine [45]. In addition, PD-L1 binding to PD-1 on the surface of CD8+TCs, weakens the function of cytotoxic CD8+TCs and promotes immune escape in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [48]. In conclusion, both dysfunction of the cytokine IL-17 and regulatory CD8+TCs are involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. However, its mechanism of action and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis need to be further investigation.

Conclusion

Our study found that the proliferative activity of PD-L1+ cells and PD-1+ cells in CD4+T cells and CD19+B cells of SLE patients was higher than that of the corresponding negative cells. We considered that PD-L1+ cells and PD-1+ cells in SLE patients may play a role in disease activity. In addition, we further added anti-PD-L1 to T and B cell co-culture system, and found that anti-PD-L1 could restore the proliferation of CD4+T cells in SLE patients. The secretion of IFN-γ and IL-10 was inhibited. In summary, we suggest that CD19+B and CD4+T cells can interact through PD-1/PD-L1 in SLE patients, and the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis has potential value in the treatment of SLE.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the corresponding author when requested.

References

  1. Ameer MA, Chaudhry H, Mushtaq J, et al. An overview of systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Pathogenesis, classification, and management. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30330. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Maraghy N, Ghaly MS, Dessouki O, et al. CD4 + CD25-Foxp3 + T cells as a marker of Disease activity and organ damage in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(5):1033–40. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.63597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mu Q, Zhang H, Luo XM. SLE: another autoimmune disorder influenced by microbes and Diet? Front Immunol. 2015;6:608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yap DYH, Chan TM. B cell abnormalities in systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis-Role in Pathogenesis and Effect of immunosuppressive treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246231.

  5. Chatzileontiadou DSM, Sloane H, Nguyen AT, et al. The many faces of CD4(+) T cells: immunological and structural characteristics. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010073.

  6. Gang C, Jiahui Y, Huaizhou W, et al. Defects of mitogen-activated protein kinase in ICOS signaling pathway lead to CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell dysfunction in patients with active SLE. Cell Immunol. 2009;258(1):83–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.03.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rathmell JC, Fournier S, Weintraub BC, et al. Repression of B7.2 on self-reactive B cells is essential to prevent proliferation and allow Fas-mediated deletion by CD4(+) T cells. J Exp Med. 1998;188(4):651–9. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.188.4.651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Caielli S, Veiga DT, Balasubramanian P, et al. A CD4(+) T cell population expanded in lupus blood provides B cell help through interleukin-10 and succinate. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0254-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai J, Wang D, Zhang G, et al. The role of PD-1/PD-L1 Axis in Treg Development and function: implications for Cancer Immunotherapy. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:8437–45. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S221340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang X, Wang J, Deng X, et al. Role of the Tumor microenvironment in PD-L1/PD-1-mediated Tumor immune Escape. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0928-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Curran CS, Gupta S, Sanz I, et al. PD-1 immunobiology in systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 2019;97:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shi H, Ye J, Teng J, et al. Elevated serum autoantibodies against co-inhibitory PD-1 facilitate T cell proliferation and correlate with Disease activity in new-onset systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1258-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun X, Kaufman PD. Ki-67: more than a proliferation marker. Chromosoma. 2018;127(2):175–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-018-0659-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Scholzen T, Gerdes J. (2000) The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol 182(3): 311 – 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200003)182:3%3C311::AID-JCP1%3E3.0.CO;2-9

  15. Ayithan N, Tang L, Tan SK, et al. Follicular helper T (T(FH)) cell targeting by TLR8 Signaling for improving HBsAg-Specific B cell response in chronic Hepatitis B patients. Front Immunol. 2021;12:735913. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.735913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Olatunde AC, Hale JS, Lamb TJ. Cytokine-skewed tfh cells: functional consequences for B cell help. Trends Immunol. 2021;42(6):536–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2021.04.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao L, Zhou X, Zhou X, et al. Low expressions of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 by induced CD4(+)CD25(+) Foxp3(+) Tregs in patients with SLE and their correlation with the Disease activity. Cytokine. 2020;133:155119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jia XY, Zhu QQ, Wang YY, et al. The role and clinical significance of programmed cell death- ligand 1 expressed on CD19(+)B-cells and subsets in systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clin Immunol. 2019;198:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2018.11.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780400928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zacca ER, Onofrio LI, Acosta CDV, et al. PD-L1(+) Regulatory B cells are significantly decreased in rheumatoid arthritis patients and increase after successful treatment. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Said EA, Dupuy FP, Trautmann L, et al. Programmed death-1-induced interleukin-10 production by monocytes impairs CD4 + T cell activation during HIV Infection. Nat Med. 2010;16(4):452–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu Y, Huang Y, Ming B, et al. Regulatory T-cell levels in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients: a meta-analysis. Lupus. 2019;28(4):445–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203319828530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tenbrock K, Rauen T. T cell dysregulation in SLE. Clin Immunol. 2022;239:109031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2022.109031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu H, Xia L, Jia D, et al. PD-L1(+) regulatory B cells act as a T cell suppressor in a PD-L1-dependent manner in Melanoma patients with bone Metastasis. Mol Immunol. 2020;119:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2020.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rincon-Arevalo H, Wiedemann A, Stefanski AL, et al. Deep phenotyping of CD11c(+) B cells in systemic autoimmunity and controls. Front Immunol. 2021;12:635615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.635615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bartosinska J, Zakrzewska E, Purkot J, et al. Decreased blood CD4 + PD-1 + and CD8 + PD-1 + T cells in psoriatic patients with and without arthritis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35(4):344–50. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.75609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, et al. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol. 1984;133(4):1710–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sasaki T, Bracero S, Keegan J, et al. Longitudinal Immune cell profiling in patients with early systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(11):1808–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hudspeth K, Wang S, Wang J, et al. Natural killer cell expression of Ki67 is associated with elevated serum IL-15, Disease activity and Nephritis in systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019;196(2):226–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan AR, Hams E, Floudas A, et al. PD-L1hi B cells are critical regulators of humoral immunity. Nat Commun. 2015;6:5997. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu X, Chen L, Huang B, et al. The prognostic and predictive potential of Ki-67 in triple-negative Breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57094-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Xie Y, Chen L, Ma X, Li H, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathological role of high Ki-67 expression in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44281. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Krabbe LM, Bagrodia A, Haddad AQ, et al. Multi-institutional validation of the predictive value of Ki-67 in patients with high grade urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1486–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wen S, Zhou W, Li CM, et al. Ki-67 as a prognostic marker in early-stage non-small cell Lung cancer in Asian patients: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 32 studies. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:520. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1524-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi J, Hou S, Fang Q, et al. PD-1 controls follicular T helper cell positioning and function. Immunity. 2018;49(2):264–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.06.012. e4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Latchman YE, Liang SC, Wu Y, et al. PD-L1-deficient mice show that PD-L1 on T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and host tissues negatively regulates T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(29):10691–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307252101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferreira RC, Castro Dopico X, Oliveira JJ, et al. Chronic Immune activation in systemic Lupus Erythematosus and the autoimmune PTPN22 trp(620) risk allele drive the expansion of FOXP3(+) Regulatory T cells and PD-1 expression. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tekguc M, Wing JB, Osaki M, et al. Treg-expressed CTLA-4 depletes CD80/CD86 by trogocytosis, releasing free PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(30). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023739118.

  39. Carter LL, Leach MW, Azoitei ML, et al. PD-1/PD-L1, but not PD-1/PD-L2, interactions regulate the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;182(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.10.006. 124 – 34.

  40. Munroe ME, Lu R, Zhao YD, et al. Altered type II interferon precedes autoantibody accrual and elevated type I interferon activity prior to systemic Lupus Erythematosus classification. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(11):2014–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fava A, Buyon J, Mohan C, et al. Integrated urine proteomics and renal single-cell genomics identify an IFN-gamma response gradient in lupus Nephritis. JCI Insight. 2020;5(12). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.138345.

  42. Llorente L, Zou W, Levy Y, et al. Role of interleukin 10 in the B lymphocyte hyperactivity and autoantibody production of human systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Exp Med. 1995;181(3):839–44. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.181.3.839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao Y, Harrison DL, Song Y, et al. Antigen-presenting cell-intrinsic PD-1 neutralizes PD-L1 in cis to attenuate PD-1 signaling in T cells. Cell Rep. 2018;24(2):379–390e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wong M, La Cava A, Hahn BH. Blockade of programmed death-1 in young (New Zealand Black X New Zealand White)F1 mice promotes the suppressive capacity of CD4 + regulatory T cells protecting from lupus-like Disease. J Immunol. 2013;190(11):5402–10. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1202382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liao W, Zheng H, Wu S, et al. The systemic activation of programmed death 1-PD-L1 Axis protects systemic Lupus Erythematosus Model from Nephritis. Am J Nephrol. 2017;46(5):371–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000480641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang B, Chen C, Liu X, et al. The effect of combining PD-1 agonist and low-dose Interleukin-2 on treating systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1111005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1111005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gao J, Gai N, Wang L, et al. Meta-analysis of programmed cell death 1 polymorphisms with systemic Lupus Erythematosus risk. Oncotarget. 2017;8(22):36885–97. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang J, Chen J, Liang H, Yu Y. Nasopharyngeal cancer cell-derived exosomal PD-L1 inhibits CD8 + T-cell activity and promotes immune Escape. Cancer Sci. 2022;113(9):3044–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Cheng Zha, Chuanwang Song, Jie Tang for their direction and supervision during the experiment. We are also grateful to the healthy control volunteers and all of our patients.

Funding

This work was supported by Anhui Provincial Natural Science Fund Surface Project (2108085MH258), Key Project of the Natural Science Foundation Universities Anhui Province (KJ2021A0763), Anhui Bengbu Medical College Postgraduate Research Innovation Project (Byycx21064, Byycxz21093, Byycx22028), the national college students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship training Program(202210367066).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZX, CX and YW presented the idea and design. WX, XC and XD helped to collect samples. ZX, LD, HH and HT participated in the experiments and writing the manuscript. CX, HW and BL supervised the whole study and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changhao Xie or Yuanyuan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Supplementary Information

Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Human Ethics Committee of Bengbu Medical College. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no financially oriented conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Z., Dai, L., He, H. et al. The effect of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis on the interaction between CD19+B cells and CD4+T cells in peripheral blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Adv Rheumatol 63, 51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-023-00333-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-023-00333-z

Keywords