Skip to main content


  • Letter
  • Open Access

Pediatric rheumatic disease patients: time to extend the age limit of adolescence?

Advances in Rheumatology201858:30

  • Received: 26 July 2018
  • Accepted: 29 August 2018
  • Published:

Adolescence and young adulthood definitions

Adolescence (aged 10-19 years) according to World Health Organization is a period involving biological, psychological, sociocultural expressions and cognitive development. During this stage, adolescents become gradually more independent, with parents’ autonomy, attachment with the peers, beginning sexual interests and with penal responsibility [1, 2].

Young adulthood (aged 18-26 years) is a lifespan period that generally occurs complete independency, romantic relationships, end of college, begin working, become financially autonomous, leave home and start a family [3].

Brain development

In recent years, the world has changed with socio and economic barriers, leading to difficult to bear responsibility and achieve the aforementioned goals in young subjects. In addition, recent neuroplasticity studies have confirmed prolonged maturation of structures and functional brain throughout adolescence and adulthood. Therefore, executive, motivational and emotional brain functions continue after the cut-off previously established by World Health Organization [3].

Upper age limit for adolescence

It is, therefore, time for general pediatrics [3, 4] and pediatric specialties [5], including pediatric rheumatic patients, to rethink the age limit in pediatric care. The upper age limit of 21 years for adolescence was first suggested by American Academy of Pediatrics [2, 6]. The Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of United States carried out a workshop on Improving the Health, Safety and Well-Being of Young Adults and suggested that young adulthood was from 18 to 26 years [3]. Recently, other authors suggested a definition of adolescence from 10 to 24 years, based on contemporary patterns of adolescence growth in a well-known digital social world [2].

Challenges for rheumatic disease patients

For rheumatic disease patients, there are other challenges that occur in daily clinical practice in late adolescence. These issues may be related to emotional immaturity, delayed financial independence, disease activity, medications, nervous central system cumulative damage, non-adherence to drug treatment and appointments, licit/illicit drugs use, violence (bullying, suicide), risk of sexually transmitted infection, infertility issues, as well as precocious sexuality and pregnancy, reinforcing the need of age cut-off extension [5].

Is time to extend the age limit of adolescence for rheumatic disease patients?

Additional relevant issues to expand the age bracket of adolescence are the requirement of new health-care public and insurance system policies regarding inpatients and outpatients’ clinics.

The best model to establish this process is the transition program, but previous experiences of other high-income countries are not readily reproduced in low and middle-income countries mainly due to financial issues [6, 7]. In this context, it is even more important extending the upper age limit to 25 years for transfer the pediatric rheumatology patients to adult clinics. In fact, age brain maturation is more consolidated at this age and this will minimize the impact an unavoidable change in the long-term patient relationship with pediatric rheumatologist.



This study was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP 2015/03756-4 to CAS), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 303422/2015-7 to CAS, 303752/2015-7 to MTT, 301479/2015-1 to CSM and 305068/2014-8 to EB), and by Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa “Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente” da USP (NAP-CriAd) to CAS.

Authors’ contributions

CAS, MTT, CSM and EB contributed equally with this manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Children’s Institute, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas Carvalho Aguiar, 647 - Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil
Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Pediatric Rheumatology Division, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil


  1. Silva CA, Avcin T, Brunner HI. Taxonomy for systemic lupus erythematosus with onset before adulthood. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:1787–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC. The age of Adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018;2:223–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnie RJ, Stroud C, Breiner H. Investing the health and well-being of young adults. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1st ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014. p. 1–479.Google Scholar
  4. Hardin AP, Hackell JM. Committee on practice and ambulatory medicine. Age Limit of Pediatrics Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20172151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Weelden M, Lourenço B, Viola GR, Aikawa NE, Queiroz LB, Silva CA. Substance use and sexual function in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed 2016;56:323-329.Google Scholar
  6. Anelli CG, Amorim ALM, Osaku FM, Terreri MT, Len CA, Reiff A. Challenges in transitioning adolescents and young adults with rheumatologic diseases to adult Care in a Developing Country - the Brazilian experience. Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal. 2017;15:47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemente D, Leon L, Foster H, Minden K, Carmona L. Systematic review and critical appraisal of transitional care programmes in rheumatology. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:372–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2018