Fig. 1From: Comparison of the different monosodium urate crystals in the preparation process and pro-inflammationMSU crystal identification results. A, Polarized light microscope observation of the morphology of MSU crystals (×200). B, The average of lengths of MSU crystals (n = 4). C, The ratio of different lengths of MSU crystals (n = 3). D, The quantity of MSU crystals (n = 5). *p<0.05,**p<0.01. MSU, monosodium urateBack to article page