| ACR70 response rate, HR (95% CI), p value | |
---|---|---|
 | All trials | Excluding one trial from each class* |
Abatacept versus Rituximab | 1.017 (0.373, 2.845), p = 0.84 | 1.029 (0.324, 2.959), p = 0.88 |
Tocilizumab versus Rituximab | 0.791 (0.254, 2.461), p = 0.32 | 0.811 (0.224, 2.618), p = 0.40 |
Tocilizumab versus Abatacept | 0.806 (0.263, 2.505), p = 0.37 | 0.814 (0.237, 2.614), p = 0.43 |
Abatacept versus TNFi | 1.043 (0.422, 2.242), p = 0.59 | 1.063 (0.402, 2.492), p = 0.56 |
Tocilizumab versus TNFi | 0.839 (0.373, 3.804), p = 0.45 | 0.814 (0.331, 4.007), p = 0.41 |
Rituximab versus TNFi | 1.059 (0.339, 2.581), p = 0.51 | 1.042 (0.305, 2.886), p = 0.67 |
Abatacept versus placebo | 3.423 (1.422, 8.709), p < 0.001 | 3.438 (1.413, 8.762), p < 0.001 |
Tocilizumab versus placebo | 2.765 (1.240, 6.692), p = 0.009 | 2.525 (1.096, 6.921), p = 0.015 |
Rituximab versus placebo | 3.494 (1.530, 8.658), p < 0.001 | 3.509 (1.522, 8.676), p < 0.001 |