Author (year) | Scoring | Calculation |
---|---|---|
De Vita (1992) [34] | 0–normal | Range 0–6 points Scores (0–3 points) are individually calculated for each pair of parotids and submandibular glands. When the degree of inhomogeneity differs between a pair of glands, the highest degree is considered. Cut-off ≥2 points for individual gland (or 4 points total) |
1–Mild: small localized or diffuse hypoechoic areas | ||
2–Evident: multiple scattered hypoechoic areas of variable size with an inhomogeneous distribution and/or multiple or linear hyperechoic bands without an acoustic shadow | ||
3–Gross: large rounded or confluent hypoechoic areas and/or gross linear hyperechoic bands and/or multiple cysts or multiple calcifications, resulting in severe damage to the gland architecture | ||
Hocevar (2005) [42] | Parenchymal echogenicity | Range 0–48 points The scores for the 5 parameters in the 4 glands are added. Cut-off ≥17 points |
0–comparable to the thyroid | ||
1–decreased compared to the thyroid | ||
Homogeneity | ||
0–homogeneous gland | ||
1–mild inhomogeneity | ||
2– evident inhomogeneity | ||
3–grossly inhomogeneous gland | ||
Presence of hypoechogenic areas | ||
0–absent | ||
1–a few, scattered | ||
2–several | ||
3–numerous | ||
Hyperechogenic reflections | ||
Parotids | ||
0–absent | ||
1–a few, scattered | ||
2–several | ||
3–numerous | ||
Submandibular glands | ||
0–absent | ||
1–present | ||
Clearness of salivary gland borders | ||
0–clear, regular defined borders | ||
1–partially defined borders | ||
2–ill-defined borders | ||
3–borders not visible | ||
Cornec (modified De Vita) (2013) [44] | 0–normal | Range 0–16 points Maximum score of 4 points for each individual gland The final score is calculated by adding the highest score for each gland. Cut-off ≥2 points for individual gland (or 8 points total) |
1–small hypoechogenic areas without echogenic bands | ||
2–multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring < 2 mm with echogenic bands | ||
3–multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring 2–6 mm with hyperechogenic bands | ||
4–multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring > 6 mm or multiple calcifications with echogenic bands | ||
Theander (2014) [45] | 0–the parenchyma is completely homogeneous | Range 0–3 points The highest score among the 4 glands is considered. Score of 0–1 points: normal or unspecific Score of 2–3 points: abnormal, typical of Sjögren’s syndrome |
1–mildly inhomogeneous | ||
2–several rounded hypoechoic lesions | ||
3–rounded hypoechoic lesions are numerous or confluent | ||
aHammenfors (2015) [46] | 0–normal | Range 0–3 points The highest score among the 4 glands is considered. Score of 0–1 points: normal or nonspecific Score of 2–3 points: abnormal and typical of Sjögren’s syndrome |
1–a few minor focal hypo/anechoic areas | ||
2–at least one of the glands is more severely affected, with multiple focal hypo−/anechoic areas, but some homogeneous and normal-appearing salivary gland tissue remains | ||
3–severe generalized effects on at least 2 of the glands, with minimal normal-appearing glandular tissue remaining, as well as at least a grade 2 effects on the remaining gland(s). | ||
Jousse-Joulin (2019) [43] | 0–normal | Score of 2–3 points: abnormal and typical of Sjögren’s syndrome |
1–mild or unspecific and few hypoechoic areas. | ||
2–multiple focal hypo−/anechoic areas, but some homogeneous and normal-appearing salivary gland tissue remains. | ||
Diffuse and multiple focal hypo−/anechoic. No normal appearence areas salivary gland tissue. |